Lomond councillor Sally Page, pictured left,  received backing for a full assessment on the plans, once lodged, is provided against the council’s climate change aspirations.

The Conservative member said: “In 2018, the council objected to the development proposals put forward by Flamingo Land.

“We set out as council our new climate change strategy in November 2020 to reduce our emissions to net zero by 2045.

“A major development such as this needs to be assessed for its sustainability.”

Flamingo Land then withdrew the application for the West Riverside site in September 2019 after planning chiefs at Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park recommend it should be refused.

And also after the Green MSP Ross Greer had launched one of the most successful campaigns in history against it.

The developer’s own Environmental Impact Assessments states that there will be damage to ancient woodland, pollution of standing and running water, red squirrel and otter fatalities and more, all for for the construction of woodland lodges, treetop walkways, a hotel, restaurant, brewery, a monorail and much more, all to be built on what is currently public land but which will be sold off to the developer.

“This is about protecting our world-famous environment but it’s also about the fundamental question of who owns Scotland and who our beautiful country is for.

Mr Greer, who party are currently in a power sharing agreement with the SNP at the Scottish Parliament, added: “A large chunk of Loch Lomond is to be handed over to a private owner for the sake of a high-end tourist resort. The damage this will do far outweighs any positives.

National Park regulations need ‘overriding public interest’ to allow for damage to ancient woodland or to red squirrel and otter habitats – both of which the proposals admit will happen. Loch Lomond is a stunning environment – without the ancient woodland, the wildlife and the unspoilt views, that would no longer be the case.”

In February 2018, Mr Greer, pictured right,  met with Flamingo Land to discuss how their proposals might meet a series of tests, such as how local businesses would be supported, how the environment would be protected and how they plan to deal with traffic congestion.

He says thought had been given to addressing some concerns, for example they committed to seeking living wage accreditation and had some ideas for involvement of local businesses, and the vision was of something different to Flamingo Land’s Yorkshire theme park.

But ultimately, the proposal was still to sell off public land for profit and at the expense of ancient woodland, local wildlife and those who currently enjoy our National Park.

On access, Flamingo Land say that the woodland would be accessible for people to walk and relax as it currently is.

He added: “This may be technically true, but how much less welcoming will it be for local people to walk past the doors of holiday lodges, past corporate signage and beneath treetop walkways? Flamingo Land would unavoidably privatise public space at one of our nation’s greatest landmarks.

“Most of this land is under the stewardship of Scottish Enterprise, a government agency. It could belong to the community and there’s a lot of local interest in taking the site into community ownership.

“There are a range of visions for Balloch and these voices need to be heard. The fact that Scottish Enterprise are choosing to sell it off for a quick buck is something we must stand against.”

Jonathan McColl, leader of the SNP administration on West Dunbartonshire Council, who was in a “maybes aye, maybes naw” situation with this issue at a community council meeting at the outset,  as he is on so many otherissues,  has refused to comment to The Democrat

Flamingo Land protest meeting in Balloch with (left to right) Jim Bollan, Community Party; Jackie Baillie, Labour MSP;  Nick Kempe Parkswatch; ,Rory MacLeod, Save Loch Lomond; Ross Greer, Green Party MSP and Maurice Corry, Conservative. Picture by Bill Heaney