Site icon THE DEMOCRAT

THIS LAND IS OUR LAND: 95% OF PUBLIC REJECTS HELENSBURGH WATERFRONT SUPERMARKET PLANS

Helensburgh waterfront before and after the storm that wrecked the leisure centre.
The public has voted loud and clear against selling off the Common Good land on the Helensburgh Waterfront for a supermarket and retail development.
The results of the recent statutory Section 104 public consultation revealed that out of 3,430 responses, an overwhelming 94.75% opposed the sale of the town’s former leisure centre site.
KEY DETAILS OF THE SURVEY RESULTS
Massive Public Rejection: The consultation, which closed in August 2026, showed that the community overwhelmingly rejects the proposal by the preferred developer, Forrest Developments, to build a single-storey supermarket (believed to be a relocated Co-op) and three smaller retail units.
Council Projections: Despite the clear message from residents, Argyll and Bute Council officials have still not ruled out the development. A report by Executive Director Douglas Hendry warns that blocking the sale means losing £1.3 million in capital, and there is currently no alternative funding available for the site.
The Common Good Dispute: The council was legally forced to run this consultation after discovering the waterfront site sits on Common Good land.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The future of the site will be decided by the council’s Policy and Resources Committee. They are scheduled to formally debate the survey results and vote on whether to push forward with the land sale during a meeting in Lochgilphead on Thursday, October 15, 2026.
Before that, here’s a taste of what the public believes should be considered:

Louise Cowan

It’s all very well that 95% have voted against the supermarket development, but the council needs this money, and I think it’ll come down to this fact. Has anyone or organisation made plans up for something else that we’d like to see and use? If it’s not going to be a supermarket, then what do people want instead? I’m very surprised and a little annoyed that the council would allow a building like that in Helensburgh town centre, as we’ve got many listed buildings and this doesn’t fit with the area.
Good luck in having something different.
Kathleen Snell
You need some kind of leisure activities there to enjoy Helensburgh front – not another supermarket that will be blown away or damaged by the fierce winds
Joanne Stannard
Surely, just by the weather alone, no business would want to go near this area. The leisure centre is the prime example. Would be very costly annual building upkeep.

Steve Mark Slater

I wouldn’t call this ‘losing’ £ 1.3 million when folk don’t seem to want it. To lose is to be disappointed with an outcome, and a lot of us aren’t. There are no other current plans because the council never consulted people as to what they wanted or closed the option for alternatives when they proceeded with this. It’s still going because money talks, and (apparently) the 5% who want it.

In a town which is being continually failed by A&B (IMO), has a multitude of closed stores, a pattern of Vape/Turkish Barbers and such like, a supermarket isn’t a way to recover footfall to the town which already has a Co-op and Tesco. Once a vibrant seaside holiday spot, now becoming a quiet, sparse spot of convenience. We pay a premium to live here; we have great views and a brilliant community – we deserve better.

Rhu Bay

Exit mobile version