REMIT OF CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY QUESTIONED IN PARLIAMENT

By Bill Heaney

Top level talks were being sought at Holyrood last week about the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry and whether its remit remains appropriate.

Conservative MSP Miles Briggs asked for discussions on the matter to be held with the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic, Kate Forbes.

Ms Forbes told him: “The remit of the Scottish child abuse inquiry was established following extensive consultation with survivors.

“The inquiry, which has now been operating for nine years, is independent and Lady Smith, its chair, is responsible for deciding what is examined by the inquiry to fulfil its remit. I believe that the remit remains appropriate.”

However, Miles Briggs told her: “The Deputy First Minister will know that people who have attended the inquiry are concerned that many victims have felt that their voices have not been heard, that non-disclosure agreements used by public bodies have often stopped truths coming out in the inquiry, and that it is looking at only historical abuse.

“One of the campaigners has put forward the idea of establishing an independent national whistleblowing officer for education and children’s services. Will the Deputy First Minister consider that, and will she meet me and campaigners to further discuss the issue?”

Kate Forbes told him: “An important point to make is that we initially established the remit of the inquiry in order to respond to survivors’ requests. I continue to engage with survivors independently of the inquiry.
Miles Briggs MSP asked Deputy FM Kate Forbes about the remit of the Child Abuse Inquiry. Top of page Lady Smith’s inquiry has been going on for nine years.

“My view is that changing the remit at this late stage would mean that it will take significantly longer for the inquiry to reach and publish its conclusions, which would risk failing to respond to survivors of in-care abuse and would delay the opportunity to address any recommendations that the inquiry might make.”

That child abuse is prevalent in Scotland is clear from the fact that Lady Smith’s inquiry has been sitting for nine years, and this was underscored by this report in The Independent this week: 

Online Child Sexual Abuse Hits Record High After Lockdown

Walking around a Glasgow housing estate on a sunny day — where children play happily on their scooters in the green space nearby — you would never guess the horrors that took place here. 

A group of five men and two women, addled by drugs, formed a sick child abuse ring that oversaw some of the most depraved crimes against children ever uttered in a courtroom.

There is nothing remarkable about the suburb, which we cannot name for legal reasons. But inside a run-of-the-mill family home there, which became known as the “beasty house” by victims, a group were plying children with alcohol and drugs while subjecting them to a seven-year campaign of sexual depravity.

In November 2023, seven members of the ring were found guilty of abusing three children after Glasgow High Court heard how they held “child rape nights” inside the property, which became a drugs den where heroin and crack cocaine was used. Now, more than a year later, they have been sentenced.

Iain Owens, 46, Elaine Lannery, 40, Lesley Williams, 43, Paul Brannan, 42, Scott Forbes, 51, Barry Watson, 48, and John Clark, 48, were all found guilty of rape and sexual assault.

Over a two-month trial, jurors heard horrifying details of their crimes, including the attempted murder of a girl who was put in a microwave, forced to eat dog food, and hung by her clothes from a nail, as well as being chased by people wearing a devil mask.

Owens, Lannery, Williams and Brannan were also found guilty of attempted murder, however Clark was acquitted of the charge.

  • Owens and Lannery were jailed for 20 and 17 years respectively for attempted murder, multiple counts of assault, sexual assault, rape and causing a child to ingest drugs and alcohol
  • Brannan was jailed for 15 years for attempted murder, sexual assault, rape and supplying class A drugs
  • Williams was sentenced to 14 years for attempted murder, assault, rape and supplying drugs
  • Clark was sentenced to 10 years for rape and sexual assault, Watson to nine years and six months, and Forbes to eight years for rape
  • All were handed an order for lifelong restriction, meaning they will be monitored for life

It should be pointed out that Lady Smith’s remit is not the same as criminal court where people can be tried and sentenced.

It is a public inquiry where survivors can give evidence of wrongdoing and abuse and reports are prepared by the judge which are passed to interested parties who can take appropriate action in relation to what is contained in them.

Leave a Reply