NOTEBOOK: WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?

NOTEBOOK by BILL HEANEY

Never mind the state of the roads and potholes, you don’t have to go far to discover that West Dunbartonshire Council’s problems stretch way beyond these matters, serious though they may be.

We warned the Council not so long ago that the best way to attract bad publicity for any organisation would be to publish a column inviting complaints from their customers.

But West Dunbartonshire Council refuse to take advice from anyone, The Democrat in particular, and even refused to correct the spelling of the Pavilion Cafe at Levengrove Park when we told them what they were painting on their notice boards and printing in their publicity was incorrect.

Look at the signs and then look at the dictionary and you will find there’s one L of a difference.

They paid attention though, and childishly sought out a spurious reason for banning me and refusing to answer any questions from The Democrat, which residents receive completely FREE.

There’s been an avalannche of deserved publicity following the death of Pope Francis on Monday.

Francis, we are told, railed against what he termed the “pathology of power” and those in the Catholic Church who, he said, “feel themselves ‘lords of the manor’—superior to everyone and everything”.

This sage remark does not apply to the Church alone, of course.

Where it does apply though is in Church Street, in the West Dunbartonshire Council headquarters.

They are prepared to lap up publicity at any price. Even if they are economical with the truth.

This week’s Council Complaints Column on social media shows that the Church Street spinners and their bosses appear still to be addicted to publishing complaints which show them up in a bad light. I always believed it was supposed to be the other way round, .

Despite the fact that they are averse to advice from outside the walls of their £16 million plus version of Xanadu, I think it’s time these gauleiters started telling the truth.

Bin collections may be an unimportant subject when such matters are looked at in the round.

But why can’t the Council tell the paying public whether or not they are switching to a three weekly schedule for bin collections?

And when, if ever, they are going to do the right thing and scrap the brown bin charges, which will cost more to administer than will be gained from imposing them.

Who told me the public are unhappy about almost everything to do with bin collections in West Dunbartonshire? The Complaints Column has to take the blame for that.

And that column is produced by their so-called Communications Department which in this age of financial chaos is said to have an annual budget of around £400,000.

Even in matters such as bin collections, the spinners can’t – or won’t – cut the mustard and leave hundreds of unanswered questions out there.

“We’ll pass this on to the team,” they tell complainers who complain in addition to their initial complaint that they seldom get a straight answer to a straight question.

Lorna Nugent asked: “If bin collections are going to every three weeks, are the council going to supply households with extra bins?  There is no way a large family can go three weeks with only one bin.”

Jade Dunn replied: “As far as I’m aware they will send out a single permit to be put on one general waste bin to be emptied three weekly.”
Irene Millar said: “They are meant to be bringing in permits for black bins.”
Well, council taxpayers might appreciate it if we were to clarify matters for them.
But how can we if they refuse to talk to us because I asked for the sound to be turned up in order that the press and public could hear what they were saying in the council chamber?
All other versions of what happened that day are lies.
Comunicating with journalists is what they are there for. It costs us WDC taxpayers £370,000 a year to have them there — and just one of them earns an eye-watering £130,000 a year.
Sylvia Jarvis says: “We have six families living in our building. There’s no way one (1) bin per family will last three weeks.”
Bonnie Purple Heather commented: “Three weekly bin collection is a joke. I think it is absolutely ridiculous that a family of four adults has the same size of bin as a single person. 
“We recycle and reuse. What if people have pets and need to bin litter tray contents and bedding and so on?”

@@@@@

We all know the Health and Social Care Partnership’s track record for making mistakes.
Sacking doctors outwith the employment laws in the midle of a Covid Pandemic … siting a council care home up a steep hill and out of the way at Crosslet … doing similar at Garshake with a home for people with complex health problems … giving a £250,000 discount to a company with a dodgy track record …
I could go on. 
There are complaints in the Council Complaints Column, where else?, that the HSCP have announced plans to close Work Connect.
This is a specialised Supported Employability Service that supports individuals with learning disabilities, mental health, addictions and autism in employment, and provides skills based training and barrier removal for those looking to get into employment.
Maybe we need services like Work Connect more than some of the vanity projects the Council has jealously hung on to during the budget cuts fiasco?
Please find attached the petition which has more information
*Please remember to verify your email to make sure your signature is added*

@@@@@

By the way, it might be no bad thing if it was decided to have members of the Council answering the telephones and taking the complaints from angry citizens. That way, we might be able to look forward to the day when after experience of meeting and speaking with the public, they can handle the bins problem – and abolish the permit charge for having your brown bin emptied.

@@@@@

Top of the page picture is of councillors debating yet more cuts. On this occasion Balloch Library was the victim.

Leave a Reply