ANALYSIS OF SCOTTISH JUDGES’ VERDICT

Boris Johnson damaged by judges’ verdict on his true reason for suspending parliament

Analysis: Prorogation ruling deepens disharmony in Conservative party
Keir Starmer, the Brexit spokesperson for the British Labour party, has praised a decision from a Scottish appeal court ruling that Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend the UK parliament was unlawful.
The ruling from three judges in Scotland’s highest court could not have been starker: Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament for five weeks “was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect”.

It does not mean that parliament will be recalled immediately, however, because the judges decided not to issue such an interdict until the UK supreme court considers another case against the prorogation next Tuesday.

Downing Street said it would appeal the Scottish court decision, which followed an appeal against a lower court’s rejection of the case taken by 79 parliamentarians led by the SNP’s Joanna Cherry. Opposition politicians have demanded that MPs should return to Westminster immediately but any decision to recall parliament must be made by Queen Elizabeth on the advice of her ministers.

boris johnston 1.jpg 2
Bungling Boris Johnston

The Scottish court ruled that Johnson’s advice to the queen urging her to prorogue Parliament for five weeks was unlawful because its purpose was to stymie the work of MPs.

“All three first division judges have decided that the PM’s advice to the HM the Queen is justiciable, that it was motivated by the improper purpose of stymieing parliament and that it, and what has followed from it, is unlawful,” the court said.

Most damagingly for the prime minister, the judges concluded that documents produced in court showed that his true purpose was not to allow the government to bring forward its domestic agenda as he claimed but to pursue a no-deal Brexit without parliamentary interference.

Labour’s shadow Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer said it was not unusual for a court to rule that a government acted unlawfully but for the judges to say that the prime minister had not given the true reason for suspending Parliament suggested they had overwhelming evidence to that effect.

“It is incredible in one sense, that the judges have gone into this space, used the language they have, saying that essentially the prime minister, his real motive was to frustrate the process and to shut down parliament,” he said.

“For a court to say that the documents really point one way, that they undermine his case to a point where they have ruled him unlawful, that’s an incredibly powerful thing for them to have done.”

Courts in Scotland and in Northern Ireland often take a different approach to constitutional issues than those in England and Wales, and they are more inclined to rule that unconstitutional actions by a government are also unlawful. So the government will hope that the supreme court will next week overturn the Scottish court’s decision and leave Parliament suspended until October 14th.

Johnson’s advisers are confident that their strategy of framing the next election as a battle between the people and Parliament over Brexit will be successful. And they will have few scruples about portraying the judiciary as part of an out-of-touch elite standing in the way of an early exit from the EU.

The controversy over prorogation has already created disharmony within the Conservative party, however, which the court judgment can only amplify. Former Conservative attorney general Dominic Grieve said on Wednesday that if Johnson is found to have misled the queen, he should resign.

And if the supreme court upholds the Scottish judges’ ruling next week, MPs will return to Westminster where they can take up where they left off this week in inflicting one defeat after another on the prime minister as they subject his Brexit policy to the scrutiny he seeks to avoid.


One thought on “ANALYSIS OF SCOTTISH JUDGES’ VERDICT

  1. Parliament says no Brexit without parliamentary consent. Prime minister Johnson suggests he will ignore the law

    As of today Johnston, through the apparatus of state is running public adverts on commercial media to tell people to prepare for a Brexit that is happening on 31st October 2019 – and despite Parliament saying no.

    And today, Scotland’s highest court says that the suspension of Parliament is illegal – but it remains shut.

    And so there is no law. It’s broken and something to be disregarded, ignored whilst an unelected Prime Minister and his right wing apparatchiks try to take control.

    Time to bring our MPs back home and take control.

    Scotland has its own fully functioning government, legal system, civil service and police force well capable to take control from the chaos of Westminster.

    Let England have it civil war and it’s fight with the EU and Ireland and let us get on with it.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s