PPE GUIDELINES CONFUSED, STATES TORY LEADER

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, Catherine Sweeney and Jackson Carlaw.

By Bill Heaney

Fear and confusion still surround the distribution and availability of Personal Protective Equipment despite the deaths of two home care workers, including Dumbarton woman Catherine Sweeney.

Conservative leader Jackson Carlaw told the Scottish Parliament today at its first ever virtual meeting that he wished to express the heartfelt sympathies of all Scottish Conservatives to all those who have endured loss, as many families have over the course of the past week.

He said that in the wake of these losses, he would be asking First Minister Nicola Sturgeon about personal protective equipment, or PPE, as it is commonly called.

He added: “Trade unions say that the PPE guidelines are confusing; front-line staff say that the equipment is not robust enough; and care homes say that they do not get the kit until after the virus has entered the care home.

“Further, it has emerged that the new PPE distribution hubs that the Scottish Government has set up might be shut at Easter.

“For several weeks, we have been told that supplies are adequate and that the problem is with distribution.

“However, members are getting emails and calls from front-line staff and care homes.

“They have been told that they have the equipment, but they phone us to tell us that that is not the case.”

He asked the FM at what point would she be able say “with absolute confidence” that the effective distribution of PPE is in place?

And would she use logistics experts from the private sector, many of whom are currently doing nothing, or from the armed forces, which have helped elsewhere already.

Ms Sturgeon replied: “PPE is fundamental; it is of paramount importance. We have been working hard to resolve people’s concerns, which roughly fall into the following categories: the adequacy of supplies; the distribution of those supplies to where they are needed; the guidance that we are issuing to workers about what types of equipment they should be using in which circumstances; and the quality of the PPE.

“We have adequate supplies, although we are not complacent about that, as there are global pressures on supply. We have taken significant steps to improve distribution and we continue to do that, addressing glitches and concerns as they arise.

“At the briefing that [Health Secretary] Jeane Freeman and I did yesterday, we commented on our work to ensure that distribution centres will be open over the Easter weekend, just as GP practices and pharmacies will be.”

A statement had been issued earlier by the Scottish Government, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and trade unions.

That statement made it clear that whenever a health or care worker on the front line feels that they should be wearing a mask, they should do so, as their professional judgment should be the guiding factor.

She added: “Yesterday, medics wrote a letter on PPE quality, and the chief medical officer is engaging with its signatories. When the guidance that was issued last week was drawn up, there was input from experts and from the royal colleges. There has also been Health and Safety Executive input on the quality of PPE that is being provided.

“We treat these issues as hugely important and we will continue to address any concerns that arise. There is an email address that anybody in the front-line workforce can use if they have concerns that they want to be brought immediately to my attention and that of ministers.”

One comment

  1. The question of whether there was enough PPE, were the distribution supply lines robust enough, and was guidance on PPE clear enough are, important as they are, very much subsidiary questions.

    The first and most over riding question has to be why the government adopted the strategy of deliberately allowing the virus to spread. Indeed, concomitant with that, one needs to also ask the question why in early to mid February 2020 HM Government were running full page newspaper adverts to tell the public that they and the NHS were well prepared for the virus and that people could help by sneezing and coughing into a tissue, disposing of the same and washing hands.

    That is the Genesis of this crisis. Assure people that all is well prepared and let the virus spread.

    The questions about sufficiency of equipment and the clarity of understanding of the need for the deployment of protective measures are in many ways secondary to that, but in truth are not.

    Viral infections, their coefficient of spread, their lethality are matters that epidemiologists study and understand,. Albeit that the experts cannot know everything that needs to be know about a new viral strain, past outbreaks of flu, sars, mers, ebola, zika and more has let epidemiologists health officials and their governments well understand what they are facing. Indeed, against this background of the government in the UK, and in the light of scientific analysis in January 2020 classified COVID 19 had a High Consequence Infectious Disease ( or HCID)

    That the HM Government actually classified COVID 19 as an HCID it beggars belief that they then went on to spread the infection whilst telling the public that government was well prepared. Well with HCID’s having mortality rates typically between 10% to 60% you’d certainly want to be well prepared.

    Thankfully on the 19th of March 2020 the HM Government reclassified COVID 19 as a non-HCID due to it being assessed as having a low ( overall ) mortality rate now assessed at around 1%.

    With an about turn in policy being made on the 16th of March to move to a lock down one can but wonder what would have happened if COVID 19 had been a HCID.

    We should all bear the foregoing in mind as the wave of death and economic devastation now bears down on us. For me it certainly raises the most grave questions about the conduct of our government.

    Eugenics, sacrificing the old, deliberately spreading the virus, protecting the economy, taking it on the chin – we need answers. Big answers whilst presently all we get is silence and subsidiary questions.

Leave a Reply