The MSP has called for a thorough investigation into the cause of the fire and has worked closely with Jane Midgley, the mother of Simon, in her campaign to be given answers as to why her son died.
Ms Baillie, pictured right, has also raised the length of time taken to deal with the case directly with both the First Minister and the Crown Office.
She said: ““This is completely heartbreaking for all involved – not least for the families of Simon and Richard.
“After three long, painful years these families now have an outcome in the court. They are devastated and in a state of shock. This was a tragedy that could have been avoided.
“Had the staff involved been given the proper training needed, and more importantly, had the hotel owners heeded the prior warnings given to them about their safety standards, this tragedy might not have happened.
“The length of time that it has taken for this case to be concluded has caused the families involved undue stress and pain, during what is already an unimaginably difficult time for them.
“My sympathies continue to be with families and loved ones of Simon and Richard.”
Wrecked. The old Telfer Smollet mansion on the banks of Loch Lomond after the fatal fire.
And so the Court fines the company responsible £500,000 for failing to implement proper fire safety procedures. But in doing so, they also sentence the hapless porter for putting the ashes into a cupboard containing kindling and old newspapers.
Always, always the weakest link who has to shoulder some of the blame when incidents like this occur. I feel truly sorry for Mr O’Malley who must have suffered all kind of remorse for the terrible tragedy.
But what of the regulatory regime that allows centuries old building to be renovated to five star luxury standards but without fire protections? Yes, the fire may have started in the ‘fire cupboard’ but what of a building, outwardly luxurious, but inwardly lethal with unrestricted internal wall spaces ready to conduct any fire into floor and roof space infernos in minutes?
Where were the fire break protections to prevent a small fire becoming a holocaust? And why did the regulatory authorities, who flagged up the risk of the cupboard, not follow up on the risk?
All very apt to blame the company who in truth deserved to be be blamed and convicted. But what of the regulatory framework? Why no action on this. Or is it simply that the government do not accept any responsibility for regulation?
Certainly seems so. And could this happen again. Well maybe a government minister would like to tell us. The silence is deafening.