The Garshake car park where trees have been cut down to make way for housing.
He must be smarting at the folly of his ignorance of ernvironmental matters to have learned from radio and TV bulletins just this morning that more than 100 world leaders have promised to end and reverse deforestation by 2030, in the COP26 climate summit’s first major deal.
Brazil – where stretches of the Amazon rainforest have been cut down – was among the signatories on Tuesday. The pledge includes almost £14bn ($19.2bn) of public and private funds.
Experts welcomed the move, but warned a previous deal in 2014 had “failed to slow deforestation at all” and commitments needed to be delivered on.
Felling trees and hedges contributes to climate change because it depletes forests that absorb vast amounts of the warming gas CO2.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson , who is hosting the global meeting in Glasgow – Scotland’s SNP First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been left off the guest list – said “more leaders than ever before” – a total of 110 – had made the “landmark” commitment.
“We have to stop the devastating loss of our forests,” he said – and “end the role of humanity as nature’s conqueror, and instead become nature’s custodian”.
The two-week summit in Glasgow is seen as crucial if climate change is to be brought under control and Lumberjack Jonathan McColl, pictured right, for one appears to have misread the politics of it all.
The countries who have signed the pledge – including Canada, Brazil, Russia, China, Indonesia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the US and the UK (the full list is here) – cover around 85% of the world’s forests.
Some of the funding will go to developing countries to restore damaged land, tackle wildfires and support indigenous communities.
Governments of 28 countries also committed to remove deforestation from the global trade of food and other agricultural products such as palm oil, soya and cocoa.
These industries drive forest loss by cutting down trees to make space for animals to graze or crops to grow.
More than 30 of the world’s biggest financial companies – including Aviva, Schroders and Axa – have also promised to end investment in activities linked to deforestation.
And a £1.1bn fund will be established to protect the world’s second largest tropical rainforest – in the Congo Basin.
Profesor Simon Lewis, an expert on climate and forests at University College London, said: “It is good news to have a political commitment to end deforestation from so many countries, and significant funding to move forward on that journey.”
But he told the BBC the world “has been here before” with a declaration in 2014 in New York “which failed to slow deforestation at all”.
Hope and challenges ahead
There are reasons to be cheerful about the proposed plan to limit deforestation, specifically the scale of the funding, and the key countries that are supporting the pledge, writes Matt McGrath, the BBC Environment correspondent
It is also very positive that it will try to reinforce the role of indigenous people in protecting their trees. Studies have shown that protecting the rights of native communities is one of the best ways of saving forested lands.
But there are significant challenges.
Many previous plans haven’t achieved their goals. In fact, deforestation has increased since a similar pledge was launched in 2014.
There are often disputes between donors and recipients – Norway suspended funding for an Amazon fund in 2019 in an argument with Brazil’s president.
There are also major questions over how a major financial pledge could be effectively policed.
How can funders verify that forests are actually being protected without spying from satellites or challenging national sovereignty in some way?
And question marks also hang over a key plank of the new plan, which is to try to remove the link to deforestation from consumer goods sold in developed countries.
One aspect is eating meat from animals, raised on imported soy grown on cleared lands. Will governments push companies and consumers to eat less meat to save the world’s most important forests?
Ecologist Dr Nigel Sizer called the agreement “a big deal” – but that some will find the target of 2030 disappointing.
“We’re facing a climate emergency so giving ourselves another 10 years to address this problem doesn’t quite seem consistent with that,” said Dr Sizer, a former president of the Rainforest Alliance.
“But maybe this is realistic and the best that they can achieve.”
What was the failed 2014 agreement?
- The New York Declaration on Forests was a voluntary and legally non-binding agreement on deforestation in 2014
- It aimed to half deforestation by 2020, and halt it by 2030 – and 40 governments eventually signed up. But some key countries like Brazil and Russia weren’t among them
- But the agreement failed, a report in 2019 found, saying deforestation was still continuing at an alarming rate
The deal’s signatories include a number of key countries.
Indonesia is the world’s largest exporter of palm oil, a product found in everything from shampoo to biscuits. Production is driving tree destruction and territory loss for indigenous people.
Meanwhile, Russia’s huge natural forests, with more than one fifth of the planet’s trees, capture more than 1.5 billion tonnes of carbon annually.
In the planet’s biggest rainforest, the Amazon, deforestation accelerated to a 12-year high in 2020 under Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
Asked whether leaders like Brazil’s Mr Bolsonaro could be trusted to abide by the pledge, the UK’s Environment Secretary George Eustice said “we should be really positive when countries engage”.
“Last time there was an attempt at getting such a commitment on forests [in 2014], Brazil didn’t take part, neither did Russia, neither did China.
“Brazil, they’ve really engaged with us on this agenda. It’s a big step for them.”
But pressed on whether the agreement will be enforceable, Mr Eustice said: “It doesn’t go as far into talking about enforcement mechanisms and so forth, that’s not the nature of these agreements.”
He said what was different about this pledge in particular is that there is “the finance to back [it] up”.
US President Joe Biden said he was “confident” the global pledge could be met, telling world leaders: “All we need to do is summon the will and do what we know is right. We can do this.”
He said the US would lead by example, and announced it would spend $9bn (£6.6bn) to conserve and restore forests.
COP26 climate summit – The basics
- Climate change is one of the world’s most pressing problems. Governments must promise more ambitious cuts in warming gases if we are to prevent greater global temperature rises.
- The summit in Glasgow is where change could happen. You need to watch for the promises made by the world’s biggest polluters, like the US and China, and whether poorer countries are getting the support they need.
- All our lives will change. Decisions made here could impact our jobs, how we heat our homes, what we eat and how we travel.
Ana Yang, executive director at Chatham House Sustainability Accelerator, who co-wrote the report Rethinking the Brazilian Amazon, said: “This deal involves more countries, more players and more money. But the devil is in the detail which we still need to see.”
She said it was a “big building block” in the mission to keep global temperature rises below 1.5C.
But many people living in the Amazon, including in its urban areas, depend on the forest for their livelihoods and they need support in finding new incomes, she added.
Tuntiak Katan, from the Coordination of Indigenous Communities of the Amazon Basin, welcomed the deal, saying that funds should be invested in supporting indigenous communities who are able to manage and protect forests.
Mr Katan, an indigenous Shuar from Ecuador, told the BBC indigenous communities globally protected 80% of the world’s biodiversity but faced threats and violence.
“For years we have protected our way of life and that has protected ecosystems and forests. Without us, no money or policy can stop climate change,” he said.