We said it in this column at the very outset. Starmer is a warmer. I don’t have much to smile about this weather, but I laughed out loud when I read this headline in The Independent: Keir Starmer suspends Labour rebels after repeated backbench revolts.Rachel and her posh pals should not be forced to raise taxes. They should be forced out the door of no 11 Downing Street. And never allowed back in again, suspended sine die.
They couldn’t spell socialism, and that is what they and people like Dumbarton’s relatively recently elected Labour MP Douglas McAllister are supposed to be representing.
Working class parliament for working class people, my ass. Me first, more like it.
McAllister is no democratic socialist. Douglas could not punch his way out of a political paper bag. He supported all those welfare cuts that Starmer had to shame-facedly withdraw at the eleventh hour.
Had he had the principle of the West Dunbartonshire electors who voted him in then our ex-provost would be amongst those Labour MPs whom Sir Keir Starmer has suspended “as he seeks to reassert his authority after a series of damaging backbench rebellions”.
Now that would be a trick since Starmer didn’t have any authority in the first place. Authority and respect have to be earned. They are not something that can be inherited.
We understand from The Independent that the Labour rebel leader Rachael Maskell, along with Chris Hinchliffe, have been called in to see the chief whip over the recent revolt over the detested welfare reforms.
Others who have had the whip suspended, including Kirkcaldy MP Brian Leishman and Neil Duncan-Jordan, have confirmed they are amongst those MPs who have lost the party whip over “persistent breaches of party discipline”.
This disastrous move by Starmer comes before politicians depart Westminster for the summer early next week and follows speculation some Labour MPs could have been in talks to join a new party being created by ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana.
But a senior Labour figure commented: “Shows how weak they are. It only hastens Starmer’s fall by showing his absolute weakness.”
Sir Keir suffered a serious blow earlier this month when dozens of his own MPs voted against his planned welfare cuts in Parliament.
The chancellor Rachel Reeves has left him with the task of filling the £5bn hole.
The prime minister was forced into two humiliating U-turns on the legislation in less than a week to head off a revolt that threatened to defeat his government on one of its flagship policies.
Despite the climbdowns, the revolt was still the largest backbench rebellion Sir Keir has suffered so far. It may be the largest, but it won’t be the last.
@@@@@
I know David McBride, the councillor for that part of the town, has family connections in Brucehill going back more than half a century.Bill Heaney
Top of page picture: Sir Keir Starmer.