FAKE PICTURES ARE NOT JUST AN AFFRONT TO DECENT SOCIETY, BUT ARE ILLEGAL

by Liz Kendal, Labour Minister for Technoloy

No woman or child should live in fear of having their image sexually manipulated by technology.  

Yet in recent days, the Grok AI tool on the social media platform X has been used to create and share degrading, non-consensual intimate deepfakes.

The content which has circulated on X is vile. It is not just an affront to decent society, it is illegal.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) reports “criminal imagery” of children as young as 11, including girls sexualised and topless.

This is Child Sexual Abuse.  

We’ve seen reports of photos being shared of women in bikinis, tied up and gagged, with bruises, covered in blood. And much, much more.

Lives can and have been devastated by this content, which is designed to harass, torment, and violate people’s dignity.

They are not harmless images – they are weapons of abuse, disproportionately aimed at women and girls.

And they are illegal.  

Last week, X limited the image creation function to paid subscribers.

This does not go anywhere near far enough.

It is insulting to victims to say you can still have this service if you are willing to pay.

And it is monetising abuse.  

So let me be crystal clear: sharing, or threatening to share, a deepfake intimate image without consent – including images of people in their underwear – is a criminal offence.

Under the Online Safety Act, sharing images – or threatening to share them – is a criminal offence. For individuals, and for platforms.

My predecessor made this a ‘priority offence’, so services have to take proactive action to stop this content from appearing in the first place.

The Data Act, passed last year, made it a criminal offence to create – or request the creation of – non-consensual intimate images.  

And today, I can announce that this offence will be brought into force this week and that I will make it a priority offence in the Online Safety Act too.

This means individuals are committing a criminal offence if they create – or seek to create – such content – including on X – and anyone who does this should expect to face the full extent of the law.

But the responsibilities do not just lie with individuals for their own behaviour.

The platforms that host such material must be held accountable – including X.

Ofcom have confirmed that they have opened a formal investigation into X and will assess their compliance with the Online Safety Act.

The government expects Ofcom to set out a timeline for the investigation as soon as possible.

The public – and most importantly, the victims of Grok’s activities – expect swift and decisive action. So this must not take months and months.

But X doesn’t have to wait for the Ofcom investigation to conclude. They can choose to act sooner to ensure this abhorrent and illegal material cannot be shared on their platform.

If they do not, Ofcom will have the backing of this government to use the full powers which Parliament has given them.

Leave a Reply