Acting as faithful follower of American foreign policy has always carried risks as well as rewards.

The UK Government would do well to remember that historic truth before digging itself deeper into hostilities with China, in line with the current American way.

There was no shortage of reasons offered for pulling the plug on Huawei in the UK – security initially topped the bill followed by Hong Kong and alleged human rights violations.

That programme aims to transform scattered Uighurs, Kazakhs and other ethnic minorities — many of them farmers, shopkeepers and tradespeople — into a disciplined, Chinese-speaking industrial work force, loyal to the Communist Party and factory bosses, according to official plans published online.

None of these trading arrangements is new and the general rule of international trade is that noses must be held if the show is to go on. Diplomacy rather than trade is the avenue for influencing errant states.

Ethical foreign policy is a noble concept, but endlessly difficult to pursue consistently   – which is why it makes sense to separate it from trade, except in extreme circumstances.

The contention that these exist would have been more convincing if President Trump had not promptly informed the world that the UK ditched Huwaei because he told them to, which is probably the truth of the matter.

One of the problems with pleading high-mindedness is that once started, there is no logical point to stop. If China is so awful, do we really want their students?  Do we  want them to control 25 per cent of the North Sea? Do we want them funding our infrastructure?

It is not as if China lacks options. They also have a fair grasp of their own history which does not necessarily predispose them to regard the UK as a font of virtue and righteousness, entitled to lecture them on how to conduct their affairs.

Chinese state television showed Muslims attending classes on how to be law-abiding citizens. Evidence is emerging that detainees are also being forced to take jobs in new factories.

Chinese state television showed Muslims attending classes on how to be law-abiding citizens. Evidence is clear that detainees are also being forced to take jobs in new factories.

Presumably someone in Whitehall has noticed that Beijing is hoovering up “soft power” around the world with its astonishing Silk Road intiative which involves trillions of investment in every continent by scores of countries,

The Silk Road is not a geographically limiting term but flows from the concept of China as the world’s first global trading nation, regardless of oceans and borders. Via the Silk Road, it is seeking to regain that status from Africa to Latin America. Do they really need the UK that much?

A bellicose trade war with China in election year may be just what President Trump needs. It is less clear, as we walk away from the EU and reel from the Covid-19 aftermath, that it is what the UK needs.

And what of the United States on which we seem to be placing all available bets?  It should not go unnoticed that, in the real world, our great ally across the water is currently waging a trade war against us – not for us.

Though we are outside the EU, Washington continues to behave as if we are inside for the purpose of sanctions arising from the Airbus dispute. The World Trade Organisation authorised punitive US tariffs on random products in retaliation for illegal subsidies paid by Brussels.

Products targeted for prohibitive tariffs already include malt whisky, cashmere knitwear and shortbread. There is suspicion this selection reflects Trump’s animus towards Scotland in light of the great fall-out which followed the great love-in.  I know from personal experience – remember Banana Wars? –  that none of these things happen by accident.

Matters may be about to get much worse. By August 12th, the US will decide on an extension of the list which may include blended whisky and gin. Not everybody knows this, but 80 per cent of UK gin is now made in Scotland. If this happens, it is reckoned 6500 jobs are at risk.

It is surely time for the UK government to call in whatever chips it holds in Washington to point out it’s not a good look to be attacked by your greatest ally at the same time as turning your back on past friends (the EU) and valuable partners (China).

Conversely, sorting this one out would be a decent advert – not least in Scotland –  for “taking back control”.  Failure to do so by August 12th will reinforce the alternative thought that with Trump as your best friend in the world,  who needs enemies?


If we did not live in such serious times, Nicola Sturgeon’s definition of  “political” as opposed to her own blamelessly “non-political” persona would be comical for its effrontery.

Almost daily, she takes to her pulpit for a monologue that increasingly strays into diverse issues of policy. For months, there has been no right of reply or meaningful scrutiny for, of course, this is all “non-political”.

Any sceptic who makes it through security is slapped down for “politicising” the pandemic. It is “non-political” to complain endlessly about the parsimony of Whitehall but pointing out contrary evidence is shamelessly “political”.

It is, of course, “non-political” to drive the false narrative of how well Scotland has done in dealing with the virus in comparison with … well nobody, really, except marginally England which is the only “politics” that matters.

Even then, any differential is explained by higher population density,  particularly among immigrant communities.  Pointing that out – or that Scotland could have done much better by using our devolved powers earlier –  is off-the-scale “political”.

It is sometimes forgotten that there are 4200 people dead from Covid-19 in Scotland – a worse outcome than almost any other nation or region of Europe. But surely we must be doing better than Trump’s America?

Well, no actually. There are six US states with roughly the same population as Scotland. Only one, Maryland, with 3400 deaths in a six million population, comes anywhere near Scotland’s record at this stage.

Nobody should attribute “blame” and there will be inquiries in due course.  However, political scrutiny is essential and dismissing it on the grounds it is, well, “political” is a self-serving device long overdue for calling-out.


  1. I think Brian Wilson assesses the situation very correctly when he refers to our turning our backs on our friends in the EU, our valuable partner in China whilst our supposedly greatest ally the USA attacks us.

    He also makes a valid comment about the level of Covid deaths in Scotland (and indeed worse in England) as being one of the highest death rates in the world.

    And so, the question for Brian is therefore does he think that when we are fully out of Europe things in Scotland under a Westminster Tory Government, will for most people get better or worse?

    One thing we might not have to worry about is continental holidays because with the removal of the EHIC health card and the removal of entitlement to health care across the EU, the purchase private health care insurance may for many be absolutely unattainable especially for older or already health compromised individuals.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s